![]() |
![]() |
|
April 17, 2008Mark Russinovich and boundaries... are we missing a key aspect of existing security technology in Windows?So today I got to sit in a session where Mark spent time reviewing the whole aspect of security boundaries in Windows. This isn't a new talk, and is actually one I originally saw at last year's MVP Summit. But its always fun to watch his demos. Atleast, it was once AV showed up and fixed his demo machine. But it had me thinking about boundaries that exist in Windows that we just aren't leveraging effectively. He mentioned .NET CAS. Code access security is an example of a mechanism that provides evidence, permissions and policies that can enforce boundaries, and limit access exposure. It is rarely used, and when it is, is used ineffectively. It had me thinking though of another piece of technology introduced in Windows Server 2003 to the masses. That's the Authorization Manager, or AzMan as we normally call it in the security groups. AzMan gives the system and its applications role based security to provide constrained whitelist behaviour. A process that is AzMan aware is capable of enforcing policy to ensure that only users within a given role can be made availabe to take action and be restricted in what tasks they can do within a context. A well defined use of security boundaries in Windows. But no one knows about it. Did you know about it before this post? Probably not. But you should... because at this years RSA conference Microsoft announced it's end-to-end trust initiative which is heavily directed towards role based security. I think Microsoft is doing a great job in thinking ahead and providing the infrastructure so we can design and deliver more thought out secure solutions. But I wonder if they are doing enough to actually educate the world about just what they ARE doing in this space. This isn't the "Field of Dreams" where if they build it, we will come. Microsoft and its advocates are all going to need to ensure messaging about what Windows is truly capable of (good and bad) is clear, concise and to the point. I think AzMan is a great piece of role-based goodness that should be much easier to use, deploy and explain. The Visual Studio team needs to step up and tool better to make this easier for developers. What do you think? Posted by SilverStr at April 17, 2008 12:11 AM | TrackBackComments
The idea of AzMan is nice. Personally, I have found it a real pain to work with on the few projects that have included it. I'm not saying there's a better solution, but it really does need a lot of work. Posted by: OJ at April 21, 2008 01:49 AM |
![]() ![]()
My 5 Favorite Books
Writing Secure Code
Secure Programming Cookbook Security Engineering Secure Coding Principles & Practice Inside the Security Mind ![]()
My 5 Favorite Papers
Smashing the Stack
Penetration Studies Covert Channel Analysis of Trusted Systems DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria NSA Security Recommendation Guides ![]()
Archives
March 2010
October 2009 August 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 April 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 ![]() |
|