![]() |
![]() |
|
August 30, 2004SBS RantOK, I want to rant. Feel free to ignore me. Would someone be so kind as to tell me WHY all SBS wizards require that I have two ethernet cards in my box to denote private and public addressing to do all the normal security features? What if I want to simply put a box on the Internet, but still use the frigging ISA configuration, WITHOUT having a network behind it???? You know. Like a server on the Internet in a DMZ. What's sad is that the Internet Connection wizard even tells you that you need a separate firewall if you work in "router mode with a local IP". Why can't ISA be that firewall.. OUT OF THE BOX!!!! *sigh* The sad thing is a simple fix would be to throw a nic card in there and simply not use it... and call it the internal IP network. Unfortunately I don't have the room on the board to do so. Time to dig through google and see if I can fake this out with a virtual adapter somehow. Posted by SilverStr at August 30, 2004 12:05 AM | TrackBackComments
Hmm, I think I found a way to get around this using a loopback device as a virtual nic. Just not sure how to reorder the "internal nic" to point to the loopback, and the external to be the actual nic. Posted by: SilverStr at August 30, 2004 01:49 AMBecause it's all on one box dear.. we ALWAYS recommend two nics. Stop ranting on something I'd wack you upside the head at an say Smallbizserver.Net > Network: On the network diagrams that are recommended by most SBS veterans, notice all the "Two Nics AND" and notice how very few "One Nic AND" diagrams there are? There's a reason. ;-) Posted by: Susan at August 30, 2004 03:15 PMBTW exactly what IP range are the clients hanging off of? The internal IP address is where all of our clients go neatly tucked behind the ISA firewall. We normally don't put SBS on the internet all by itself, it's a Small Business server... like there's workstations usually behind it because that's where you do work at... workstations? It was designed to be the primary domain controller, the small firm's backbone. You don't read email on it, nor surf the web, nor do "work" on it. You want a network behind it in about 99.999999% of the cases, unless of course you are Dana in which case I refer back to the fact that from the get-go I said you are not a normal Small Business Server customer in the first place. They kinda don't build wizards for .00000001% of the marketplace ;-) Posted by: Susan at August 30, 2004 03:21 PMSusan, My point is that every other server operating system in the world works fine in a standalone environment with one nic. I fully understand the recommendations that Microsoft has, and its reasoning for two nics. But I find it hard to believe that they never came across clients who simply want to hang one of these out on a DMZ as a "Internet box" without having a LAN behind it. This is a NORMAL deployment for a virtual office. Or a dedicated web server with SQL server. In my case, I have to deal with the need of having consultants all over the world having access to internal sharepoint, and Exchange with OWA. I have no need to have them on our corporate LAN, and a SBS seems to be the right ticket to make a "virtual office". Knowing how easy it was to do the loop back trick (see my other post), I am suprised Microsoft hasn't just had a default install put the second loopback nic in! Posted by: SilverStr at August 30, 2004 03:43 PMBTW, servers shouldn't be considered whimpy just cuz they don't have a plethora of free slots available. These little Dell rack mount units are awesome. Even if you have to use half card to get anything working! Posted by: SilverStr at August 30, 2004 03:48 PMWe're not every other operating system in the world. I warned you from the start that we're special, and you are not the "normal" SBSer. You've just proven that in your blog post. This isn't the typical set up at all. Typical SMALL firms are not virtual, show me a SBS network and they'll want one or two workstations. Heck I've got three workstations here at home with my Sister and I [not counting the dog]. Why not the loopback trick? Because again... think of the marketplace. This box is not built for exceptions but for the average firm. Would it be a cool MS wish item.. actually it probably would. Or for that matter an interesting "if you would want to" item for a book. Especially for a virtual office as you said, but again, for the typical firm, SBS isn't set up this way. I was going to rag on you and offer to send you a nic card if you needed it :-) We're starting to see firms move to the rack mounts but again, look at the Dell servers that come preinstalled with SBS and they are typically not rack mounts. Just proving once again... you're not the "normal" SBSer :-) But you are welcome nonetheless. I really look forward to your insights and thoughts going forward. Hey... I just realized.. don't rant on SBS... rant on ISA 323387 - How To Connect Your Company to the Internet by Using an ISA Firewall with Windows Server 2003: To install an ISA firewall, you need a computer with two network adapters. You must connect one of these adapters to your internal network and the other adapter to your Internet service provider (ISP). Your ISP can help you make this connection. A firewall acts as a security barrier between your internal network (or intranet) and the Internet by preventing outside users on the Internet from gaining access to the confidential information on your intranet or your computer. Hey, Dr. Tom! He should be ranting about you not SBS ;-) btw you do know about www.isaserver.org and www.isatools.org right? Posted by: Susan at August 30, 2004 09:31 PM |
![]() ![]()
My 5 Favorite Books
Writing Secure Code
Secure Programming Cookbook Security Engineering Secure Coding Principles & Practice Inside the Security Mind ![]()
My 5 Favorite Papers
Smashing the Stack
Penetration Studies Covert Channel Analysis of Trusted Systems DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria NSA Security Recommendation Guides ![]()
Archives
March 2010
October 2009 August 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 April 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 ![]() |
|