![]() |
![]() |
|
April 22, 2004Security in Longhorn: Focus on Least PrivilegeMicrosoft has released an interesting article on a least privileged environment that is going to significantly increase the security of the "Longhorn" Windows platform. Get started today by writing managed code, first of all, and when building desktop applications, make them LUA (Limited Unit Application programming interface) compliant are steps Microsoft recommends for the platform. Longhorn promises to be a great platform for least privileged applications. Read the article and learn how to get started today by writing managed code. When building desktop applications, you can make them LUA compliant and then use the Windows Application Verifier to help check your work. If you care about the future of security on Longhorn, this is a good introductory article. Posted by SilverStr at April 22, 2004 01:56 PM | TrackBackComments
I thought LUA meanted 'limited user account', as in a non-administrator, non-power user - plain-vanilla regular user. Posted by: Stephen at April 22, 2004 11:11 PMWill Longhorn be backward compatible? Then I don't think a lot will change. If there's a layer that has to execute the old applications chances are the new paradigms will be picked up about 6-12 months after the release of Longhorn. Posted by: Axel at April 23, 2004 01:52 AMYes, LUA means Limited (or Least-Privileged) User Account. Posted by: Robert Hurlbut at April 23, 2004 11:32 AM |
![]() ![]()
My 5 Favorite Books
Writing Secure Code
Secure Programming Cookbook Security Engineering Secure Coding Principles & Practice Inside the Security Mind ![]()
My 5 Favorite Papers
Smashing the Stack
Penetration Studies Covert Channel Analysis of Trusted Systems DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria NSA Security Recommendation Guides ![]()
Archives
June 2007
May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 ![]() |
|