![]() |
![]() |
|
October 20, 2003Yet another Linux distro for InfoSec ProsIn my opinion, one of Linux's most powerful attributes is one of its worst failures. Everyone shouts out that "choices" are good. And to a point, I agree with that. But today I learned on freshmeat that there is yet ANOTHER Linux Bootable CD distro focused on Information Security Professionals called L.A.S.. I do not mean to criticize L.A.S. as I haven't tried it, but I don't need to. From their own admissions, its based on Knoppix. *sigh* So why not help out the Knoppix-STD project thats been around for a while! This is one of the falling graces of Linux. Everyone wants to build their own tools instead of getting together, consolidate talent and make kick ass product. The Knoppix "Security Tools Distribution" is something I have talked about before, and is something I enjoy using. More to the point, it is exactly what InfoSec personnel need in their toolkits. The effort that could go into making it better (like better audit reporting facilities for forensic purposes etc) would be way more productive than patching together yet another distro. But I digress. If you want to try 'yet another distro' for InfoSec purposes, consider seeing if L.A.S. is to your liking. Posted by SilverStr at October 20, 2003 08:39 AM | TrackBackComments
(This is my reply to your post on the L.A.S. Linux site. I would also note that L.A.S. is on version 0.4, it's first public release was 0.3b. I have been developing L.A.S. for well over 6 months just not made it public) The reasons you state in your post are the very reasons why I have made L.A.S. Linux. By targeting the size of a mini CD I insured that the focus stayed true. Each addition is weighed heavily due to the size limitation. Knoppix-STD is a good distro which on the forums was where I first announced L.A.S. But it is more of an 'all in one' distro which there is of course a need for, but it is not the same as L.A.S. The other goal I have set for L.A.S. is trying to release new versions on a 'regular schedule' instead of treating it as a hobby that one looses intrest in and time to work on (I am not refering to any distro in particular here). The main difference between L.A.S. and other security related distros is 700MB vs. 185MB. I wanted to also illustrate that one can put hundreds of tools along with a desktop and productivity tools in a package so small. The entire uncompressed L.A.S. 0.4 MAIN is only 503MB. Having what I believe is the greatest number of tools even compared to the larger distros. After all games and OpenOffice take up a great deal of space. (It is also much easier to find a computer with 256MB of RAM to run L.A.S. in than a machine with 1GB of RAM to run Knoppix or others in.) As far as focus on tools you mentioned. I feel that L.A.S. is helping greatly in this pursuit. Being that I get many emails from users that would have otherwise never used most of these tools. So by increasing the userbase of these tools it in turn helps the authors make the tool better. If you refer to the FAQ I encourage users with bugs or issues regarding a tool (not L.A.S.) to contact its author to report this. Thus improving them. To be fair in terms of security distros there is also: and a few others I believe, just can not recall. . .but please feel free to add them here to this thread to be fair to all. Although Knoppix-STD is evidently your favorite. I hope this helps to explain your questions. Thanks for the well wishes! Jascha All really good points. Not much I can comment on here. (Except maybe that Knoppix-STD works awesome on my laptop with 128megs of ram) Good luck with L.A.S. Posted by: SilverStr at October 20, 2003 10:37 AMSorry. . . just to clarify, I was refering to using the 'toram' option which copies the entire L.A.S. image into the physical RAM to allow the CD to be removed. Which frees up the CDROM for burning or use while L.A.S. runs in memory. Which runs very fast in a machine with 256 or RAM being that L.A.S. is only 183MB. I find it very useful for data recovery and forensics. . . Nice looking blog by the way. . . -J- Posted by: Jascha at October 20, 2003 12:52 PMIf you have had a data loss situation youmay be interested in this site. http://www.datamole.com DM Posted by: data recovery at September 29, 2004 06:39 AM |
![]() ![]()
My 5 Favorite Books
Writing Secure Code
Secure Programming Cookbook Security Engineering Secure Coding Principles & Practice Inside the Security Mind ![]()
My 5 Favorite Papers
Smashing the Stack
Penetration Studies Covert Channel Analysis of Trusted Systems DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria NSA Security Recommendation Guides ![]()
Archives
December 2005
November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 ![]() |
|