June 07, 2003

Understanding Shareware

Was reading Chris's blog and found a few interesting links that might apply to me, or atleast to some other people who read my blog.

The first link is an article about Shareware Amateurs vs. Shareware Professionals. Quite an interesting insight into the mindset of such people. It is also bang on in explaining how you need to MAKE opprotunities and work at it, as it doesn't simply come to you.

The other link was to an interesting blog I will start reading semi-regularly called A Shareware Life. In it the author "rants about shareware marketing, the life of a shareware author, and everything else". I haven't dug to deep into the archives yet, but will get to it one of these days. Looks pretty interesting.

Which now gets me to a couple of questions for anyone who might wish to respond. If you were going to try out some more expensive shareware software before you bought it (lets say a couple hundred dollars), how would you expect it to be performed? Shareware? Nag-ware? Crippleware? What sort of registration process would you be willing to accept?

Ie: Would you be ok with crippleware with full functioning, but limited on time, or crippled in only doing everything once etc. Would you honor the shareware concept and buy it after you use it? Would you accept the nag screens, or simply find a crack?

Here is another question. Did you buy winzip? Did you get a crack for it? Or do you accept the nag screen at the beginning?

I understand you may not wish to post you answers publically. If so, email me.

Would love to get some feedback from some of you. Please let me know how you feel on this subject.

Posted by SilverStr at June 7, 2003 11:33 AM
Comments

Winzip might be a bad example, as it's now been made irrelevant by the inclusion of zip file browsing in windows xp. I spent many a day looking at the "you have -8,456 days remaining in your 30 day evaluation" for winzip, same as I did for pkzip back in the day. Generally I try out software but while I may not completely honor the shareware way, it is generally because it's not what I wanted. If I get software that I really want, and really use, I will generally either buy it or honor the shareware agreement. These days however, most of the software I use is free, beer and speech wise.

Posted by: Arcterex at June 7, 2003 07:09 PM

That's kind of a tough one to answer off the top of my head. I would think that the intended function of the product would determine what I would put up with. Obviously, it would have to allow me to properly be able to preview and test the product.

As for using shareware... I will/do honour the shareware system. Although it has been a while since I've used & paid for shareware. Telix, Terminate, SIO, and even Doom being past examples.

It's been a while since I've used a shareware product though. The Winzip example doesn't apply to me as I use Ultimate Zip instead which is freeware. Most of the time I'm in Linux for my day to day stuff, so whatever I need is only an apt-get away.

Posted by: BSpudd at June 8, 2003 12:11 PM


No matter how hard I tried,
I could find no reason for people to create software and then give it out for free.
It costs hell of time to develop something, why not sell it?
There must be some reason.
Brian

Posted by: Brian at April 7, 2004 05:33 AM